Dangerous Method, A (2011) [Blu-ray]
Biography | Drama | Thriller
Based on the true story of Jung, Freud and the patient who came between them.
From acclaimed director David Cronenberg (A History of Violence) comes a dark tale of sexual and intellectual discovery, featuring two of the greatest minds of the 20th century. Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender, Shame) has just begun his psychiatric career,
having been inspired by the great Sigmund Freud (Viggo Mortensen, The Lord of the Rings trilogy). When a mysterious and beautiful woman (Keira Knightley, Atonement) goes under Jung's care, Jung finds himself crossing the line of the doctor/patient
relationship, causing great conflict with his mentor and making Jung question his own morality in the process.
User Comment: kkhannah from Canada, 13 December 2011 • I must admit, going into this film, I was rather excited; I've enjoyed both of David Cronenberg and Viggo Mortensen's previous collaborations and my interest in both Freudian
psychology/psychoanalysis and Michael Fassbender practically guaranteed that I would be seeing this film. I fear now, however, that my expectations may have been a bit too high.
I must admit, however, that I thought that Michael Fassbender and Viggo Mortensen played their roles very well, although Mortensen definitely didn't receive as much screen time as he deserved. Vincent Cassel definitely shone in his extended cameo as Otto
Gross. I did have some issues with Keira Knightly's acting, however. I feel like she may have over exaggerated her actions, particularly in the beginning scenes where she is in the midst of hysteria.
However, my real problem with this film is that, for lack of a better term, it all seems a little too shallow. Events that should be important are skimmed over and not explained; to be honest, it doesn't particularly seem like anything of real importance
happens in the film. The characters have little depth; despite the fact that they are all playing rather well known persons, there simply isn't anything to them other than a name. On top of this, despite what the taglines of the film and trailer seem to
suggest, the relationship between Freud and Jung is hardly explored. For the most part, their scenes involve reading letters from the other. This is hardly compelling viewing.
Overall, I feel like this film would have been better if it had been longer. If the film had a running time of even two hours, compared to one and a half, more character development could have been inserted, particularly for Freud. In addition, more focus
on Jung's relationship with Freud, rather than his relationship with Spielrein, would have been nice to see.
Here's hoping that any future collaborations between Cronenberg and Mortensen pack a bit more of a punch.
Summary: There's Something Missing Here...
User Comment: *** This review may contain spoilers *** simona gianotti from Italy, 31 October 2011 • I really expected more by this movie, I expected more pathos, but unfortunately it proved scarcely
involving and too rational. Nothing to say against the perfect technical execution, and the good acting, but what is disappointing is the screenplay, which should have been, in my opinion, the most significant element of the picture. Dialogues are flat,
too rationally aimed at conveying an encyclopedic definition of psychoanalysis, but incapable of conveying empathy towards any of the three main characters, Jung, Freud and Sabine Spielrein. In the end we do not get the depth of each character, and the
subtlety of their relationship. Keira Knightely 's character is overacted, excessive,but in the end underdeveloped, just the prototype of a pathologically insane. Freud appears a weird old man, only caring for what the scientific community might think,
but not as daring as we think he might have been, Jung is a pathetic unfaithful man, but with an inner fragility we cannot perceive fully. And the complexity of the relation analyst-patient as well as master-disciple never comes out. It's a movie that
seems to promise plenty, seems to be always on the verge of revealing something, but never takes off, as if the director wanted to keep a distance from the handled subject, as if afraid of being swept away by the abyss of the human complex mind. Or maybe
because the complexity is too great to be thoroughly revealed? maybe, but being this the reason, the result remains unconvincing.
Summary: Rather flat and encyclopedic.
[CSW] -3.3- I will admit that although I thought I knew both doctors well I was surprised to find that Dr. Freud instead of hoping to cure his patients had never moved beyond just developing the means of determining what was wrong with them in the belief
that by them just knowing what was wrong with them was adequate therapy. It was never made clear whether Dr. Yung fully embrace the idea of actually trying to cure his patients. This film would be very illuminating to anyone not familiar with to these two
great psychoanalysts. I did feel that there could've been a little bit better character development and interaction between the two had the film been a little bit longer. Overall I have to agree with the second user comment above it did appear "Rather
flat and encyclopedic."
[V5.0-A4.5] MPEG-4 AVC - No D-Box.
º º